🔗 Share this article

The number of guaranteed positions for Māori representatives on New Zealand councils will be slashed by over 50%, after a controversial legislative amendment that forced local governments to submit the fate of hard-won Māori seats to a public vote.

Background Information on Indigenous Representation

Indigenous electoral districts, which can include multiple councillors depending on local population numbers, were established in 2001 to give Indigenous voters the choice to vote for a guaranteed Indigenous council member in local and regional authorities. Originally, councils were only able to establish a Māori ward by initially putting it to a public vote in their region. Local populations often devoted considerable time building local support and urging their local governments to create Indigenous representation.

Policy Changes and Administrative Decisions

To address this concern, the previous Labour government allowed municipal authorities to set up a Indigenous seat without initially mandating them to put it to a popular ballot.

However, this year, the right-wing coalition government reversed the change, saying local residents should decide whether to establish Indigenous representation.

Voting Outcomes

The new legislation required local authorities that had established a ward under Labour’s rules to conduct decisive public votes concurrently with the municipal polls, which concluded on 11 October. Of 42 councils participating in the referendum, 17 voted to retain their seats, and twenty-five to disestablish theirs – revealing many regions against guaranteed Māori representation.

The results represented “a vital step in reinstating community self-determination.”

Opposition parties nevertheless have criticised the new policy as “discriminatory” and “anti-Māori”. Since taking office, the coalition government has ushered in extensive reversals to policies designed to enhance Māori health, wellbeing and representation. The government has said it wants to terminate “ethnic-specific” policies, and says it is dedicated to enhancing results for Indigenous people and every citizen.

Urban-Rural Divide

Outcomes of the referendums were split down city-country divisions – most cities required to vote backed Māori wards, while countryside areas skewed heavily towards disestablishing them.

“It’s a real shame for the Māori wards that had recently been established – they’re only just starting to find their footing.”

Electoral Participation and Criticism

This year’s local government elections registered the lowest voter turnout in 36 years, with under one-third of eligible voters casting a vote, leading to calls for an overhaul.

This approach had been “a mockery”.

Comparative Treatment

Local governments are permitted to create different electoral districts – including rural wards – without initially mandating a public vote. The different conditions applied to Māori wards suggested the government was singling out Māori representation.

“Well, they failed. Many communities have expressed strong opposition.”

This remark concerned the 17 regions that voted to retain their seats.