The Documentary Legend reflecting on His Latest War of Independence Film Series: ‘We Won’t Work on a More Important Film’
Ken Burns has evolved into more than a filmmaker; he represents an institution, an unparalleled production entity. When he has television endeavor premiering on the television, everybody wants a part of him.
The filmmaker completed “more fucking podcasts than I ever thought possible”, he says, wrapping up of his extensive publicity circuit featuring four dozen cities, 80 screenings and hundreds of interviews. “With podcasts numbering in the hundreds of millions, I feel I’ve participated in a substantial portion.”
Thankfully Burns possesses boundless energy, as loquacious behind the mic as he is prolific while filmmaking. At seventy-two has traveled from historical sites to The Joe Rogan Experience to discuss one of his most ambitious projects: The American Revolution, an extensive six-episode, twelve-hour film project that consumed the past decade of his life and arrived currently on PBS.
Defiantly Traditional Approach
Similar to traditional cooking in an age of fast food, The American Revolution intentionally classic, more redolent of The World at War than the era of digital documentaries and podcast series.
However, for the filmmaker, whose entire filmography documenting American historical narratives spanning various American subjects, its origin story transcends ordinary historical coverage but fundamental. “As I mentioned to directing partner Sarah Botstein the other day, and she agreed: no future work will carry greater importance,” Burns contemplates by phone from New York.
Massive Research Effort
Burns and his collaborators along with writer Geoffrey Ward drew upon thousands of books plus archival documents. Numerous scholars, representing diverse viewpoints, offered expert analysis along with leading scholars from a range of other fields such as enslavement studies, first nations scholarship and imperial studies.
Distinctive Filmmaking Approach
The documentary’s methodology will appear similar to devotees of The Civil War. Its distinctive style featured gradual camera movements over historical images, generous use of period music with performers voicing historical documents.
This period represented the filmmaker cemented his status; years later, currently the elder statesman of documentary filmmaking, he can attract numerous talented actors. Participating with Burns at a New York gathering, renowned playwright Lin-Manuel Miranda noted: “Nobody declines an invitation from Ken Burns.”
Remarkable Ensemble
The lengthy creation process proved beneficial regarding scheduling. Filming occurred in recording spaces, in relevant places using online technology, an approach adopted throughout the health crisis. Burns recounts working with Josh Brolin, who scheduled a brief window in Atlanta to record his lines as the revolutionary leader then continuing to other professional obligations.
Brolin is joined by multiple distinguished artists, Jeff Daniels, Morgan Freeman, Paul Giamatti, diverse creative professionals, household names and rising talent, celebrated film and stage performers, Damian Lewis, Laura Linney, Tobias Menzies, versatile character actors, Wendell Pierce, Matthew Rhys, Liev Schreiber, plus additional notable names.
Burns emphasizes: “Honestly, this could represent the finest ensemble ever assembled for any movie or television show. Their contributions are remarkable. Their celebrity status wasn’t the criteria. It irritated me when questioned, ‘So why the celebrities?’. I responded, ‘These are performers.’ They represent global acting excellence and they vitalize these narratives.”
Nuanced Narrative
However, no contemporary observers remain, visual documentation forced Burns and his team to depend substantially on primary texts, weaving together the first-person voices of nearly 200 individual historic figures. This approach enabled to introduce audiences beyond the prominent leaders of that era plus numerous additional essential to the narrative, many of whom never even had a portrait painted.
Burns also indulged his personal passion for geography and cartography. “Maps fascinate me,” he notes, “with greater cartographic content in this film than in all the other films throughout my entire career.”
Global Significance
Filmmakers captured footage at nearly a hundred historical locations in various American regions and in London to capture the landscape’s character and collaborated substantially with living history participants. All these elements combine to tell a story more bloody, multifaceted and world-changing versus conventional understanding.
The documentary argues, transcended provincial conflict about property, revenue and governance. Instead the film portrays a brutal conflict that finally engaged multiple global powers and improbably came to embody described as “mankind’s greatest hopes”.
Internal Conflict Truth
What had begun as a jumble of grievances aimed at the crown by American colonists in 13 fractious colonies rapidly became a vicious internal war, pitting family members against each other and creating local enmities. In episode two, the historian Alan Taylor observes: “The main misapprehension concerning independence struggle centers on assuming it constituted that unified Americans. It leaves out the reality that it was a civil war among Americans.”
Nuanced Understanding
In his view, the revolution is a story that “generally is drowning in sentimentality and idealization and is incredibly superficial and insufficiently honors the historical reality, all contributors and the extensive brutality.
It was, he contends, a revolution that proclaimed the world-changing idea of the unalienable rights of people; a brutal civil war, separating rebels and supporters; and a global war, continuing previous patterns of wars between imperial nations for the “prize of North America”.
Uncertain Historical Outcomes
Burns also wanted {to rediscover the