🔗 Share this article

In today's Britain, protest is no longer a basic freedom. Instead, it has become a conditional permission that authorities allow or deny as they see fit. This constitutes the underlying meaning of proposed measures that the ruling administration is putting forward, which would dictate the timing and location demonstrations can occur, with possible prison sentences for those who disobey these restrictions.

Erosion of Civil Liberties

Previous governments had already undermined this essential right: the former Conservative government had granted law enforcement sweeping new authorities, which global rights bodies had condemned as "significant and unjustified limitations" on civil liberties. Collectively, these incremental assaults on liberty have practically abolished the historically earned right to public demonstration.

Using Tragedy to Justify Crackdown

The most recent limitations are being defended by citing last week's heinous anti-Jewish attack on a Manchester Islamic center. We can all agree on universal agreement that the security of British Jews must be safeguarded. However, using this atrocity as a justification to suppress opposition is not only disconnected to that responsibility but distorts it.

"When you cannot draw the line at genocide, you likely cannot draw the line at democratic principles," commented a prominent American author, a statement that rings true for the current government.

Historical Perspective of Demonstration

Reflect on Britain's long tradition of protest and activism against racial discrimination and fascism, from the 1936 Battle of Cable Street to after World War II Jewish groups opposing fascism and the 1970s demonstrations against the far-right organization. Many of these early protesters were labeled as radicals in their era, even while they were advocating the rights of marginalized groups.

Current Reality

In today's complicated landscape, here's what's actually happening: Israel – a sovereign nation – is perpetrating acts that international bodies have described as genocide. Its military actions have led the International Criminal Court to issue legal indictments against Israel's prime minister and his former defense minister.

Western popular sentiment has shifted dramatically against Israel's violent actions. In Britain, a substantial majority of the public believe Israel has probably committed international law violations. Most people would support a total prohibition on weapons exports to the state, and approve the detention of Netanyahu.

Suppressing Opposition

Having essentially failed the public debate, Israel's supporters are now exploiting a despicable antisemitic crime to try to silence a popular campaign against a moral catastrophe. The British government seems included in this effort. Government officials have failed to implement comprehensive sanctions on Israel and have permitted weapon shipments to proceed.

People who are demonstrating against the erasure of Gaza have been characterized as dangerous radicals. Yet there's a significant reason why there hasn't been a broader suppression on these protesters until now: very limited protesters have made genuinely hateful statements about Jewish people, giving police authorities minimal reason to intervene.

Dangerous Conflation

Equating Jewish heritage with the policies of the government of Israel is not only manipulative but also harmful. The official definition of anti-Jewish prejudice, accepted by the British government and many organizations, has been appropriately questioned for potentially restricting legitimate criticism of Israel. However, there should be universal agreement about one of its central illustrations: that "making Jewish people generally accountable for decisions of the state of Israel" constitutes prejudice against Jews.

Increasing Limitations

This is why we've arrived at a situation where police authorities can propose that demonstrations opposing Israel's actions should be canceled because they might "accidentally or deliberately" support anti-Jewish sentiment. Similarly, political figures have stated that acknowledgment of Palestine as a nation has made political parties "implicated" in supposed mistreatment faced by Jewish communities.

Double Standards

On the very day as the religious center assault, the Israel's army killed numerous of Palestinian civilians in Gaza – adding to the horrific toll from two years of daily atrocities that have claimed many thousands of human lives. British political leaders and news organizations have barely concealed the limited value they attach to Palestinian life. This represents one of the most brazen expressions of discrimination in contemporary society.

Breaking Boundaries

Our government has already crossed a concerning boundary by proscribing Palestine Action, a non-violent, human rights-focused activist collective. Multiple thousands of British demonstrators have been arrested, mostly for carrying placards opposing genocide and endorsing the banned organization. Many of those detained are pensioners; including a retired priest and the child of a Holocaust survivor.

International Parallels

It's easy to see where this trajectory leads. In the United States, government officials helped vilify pro-Palestinian protests: a former House Speaker suggested that some were "linked with" foreign governments, while the current president described such demonstrations as anti-Jewish. In doing so, they contributed to normalizing the authoritarian crackdown on such protests – and on free speech in general.

Looking Ahead

If a conservative administration comes to power, it would be granted extensive authority to suppress opposition. What might a Reform government do with this repressive toolkit? Our forebears fought, suffered and died to establish our liberties. We may eventually rue how easily we allowed them to be eroded.